CompCode
Compare Use cases Pricing Docs Blog Log in Start free
Plan design

The decisions behind a commission plan.

Each page takes one structural choice, costs it both ways on real numbers, and says what breaks in production. Written for whoever has to design the plan, not whoever has to buy the software. The config that implements each one is at the bottom of the page.

Engagement type routing retainer, project, and referral revenue to three different rules
Featured · Use Case

Agency commission: retainers, projects and referrals

Retainers recur, projects are one-off, referrals cost nothing to deliver. Paying one percentage across all three overpays somewhere and underpays elsewhere.

July 30, 2026 · 4 min read Read the trade-off →
Marginal quarterly tier bands bounded by a floor gate and a cap multiplier
Use Case

Enterprise commission plans: rate on revenue or target

Paying a rate on revenue and paying a multiple of variable target look similar until quotas differ. One rewards the rep with the easier number.

July 30, 2026 · 4 min read Read →
One pipeline splitting into self-serve and sales-assisted rules via deal conditions
Use Case

PLG commission: paying on self-serve and sales-assisted

When self-serve and sales-assisted revenue share a pipeline, one flat rate overpays for signups and underpays for real selling. Splitting them is the fix.

July 30, 2026 · 4 min read Read →
Crossing quota retroactively re-rating the whole quarter under full_rate tier mode
Use Case

Quarterly accelerators: retroactive or marginal rates

Crossing quota can re-rate the whole quarter or only pay the revenue above it. The same $625,000 quarter costs $100,000 or $55,000 depending on which you pick.

July 30, 2026 · 4 min read Read →
A periodic rule paying variable target times a tier multiplier at period end
Use Case

Quota bonuses: lump sums against per-deal commission

A period-end bonus and a per-deal rate can cost the same and behave completely differently. One pays for the quarter, the other pays for the deal.

July 30, 2026 · 4 min read Read →
A rep's closed deal cascading into a team lead override and a per-rep tier override
Use Case

Manager overrides: paying leads on their team's deals

A one percent override on team revenue and a ten percent share of team commission look equivalent until the team's mix changes. Then they diverge.

July 30, 2026 · 4 min read Read →
Value-based tier ladder paying each consumption band its own marginal rate
Use Case

Usage-based commission: paying on revenue that moves

Consumption revenue changes after the deal closes. Paying at close, at first invoice, or continuously produces three different numbers for the same customer.

July 30, 2026 · 4 min read Read →
CompCode

Commission plans as code. Statements your team trusts. Plan changes in minutes.

All systems operational

Product

Documentation API Reference Changelog

Integrations

Attio HubSpot

Compare

All use cases vs CaptivateIQ vs Spiff vs Xactly vs QuotaPath

Company

About Blog Security Privacy Terms
© 2026 CompCode. Built for revenue teams who are done with spreadsheets. Commission plans as code